Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
Human Sustainability
Maryland DOE
Last updated:
2015-03-18 19:05:36
Lessons for this standard
No resources have been tagged as aligned with this standard.
Related standards
More specific sub-standards
Finer grained standards that are part of this one
Emphasis is on the conservation, recycling, and reuse of resources (such as minerals and metals) where possible, and on minimizing impacts where it is not. Examples include developing best practices for agricultural soil use, mining (for coal, tar sands, and oil shales), and pumping (for petroleum and natural gas). Science knowledge indicates what can happen in natural systems—not what should happen.
Maryland DOE
Last updated:
2015-03-18 19:05:36
Similar standards elsewhere
Standards derived from the same national standard
Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
Rhode Island DOE
Last updated:
2014-07-23 13:24:42
Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
Vermont DOE
Last updated:
2014-07-30 14:52:38
Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
New York DOE
Last updated:
2017-01-23 16:07:05
Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
Kansas DOE
Last updated:
2015-03-18 19:05:36
Evaluate competing design solutions for developing, managing, and utilizing energy and mineral resources based on cost-benefit ratios.
District of Columbia DOE
Last updated:
2014-07-30 16:21:17