Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Engineering, Technology, and Applications of Science
Wyoming DOE
Last updated:
2017-12-13 17:32:39
Lessons for this standard
No resources have been tagged as aligned with this standard.
Related standards
More specific sub-standards
Finer grained standards that are part of this one
Similar standards elsewhere
Standards derived from the same national standard
Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Missouri DOE
Last updated:
2017-10-08 18:34:37
evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
West Virginia DOE
Last updated:
2015-05-11 16:46:08
Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Iowa DOE
Last updated:
2015-08-30 16:20:11
Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
District of Columbia DOE
Last updated:
2014-07-30 16:16:01
Evaluate competing design solutions using a systematic process to determine how well they meet the criteria and constraints of the problem.
Rhode Island DOE
Last updated:
2014-07-23 13:18:57