Skip to main content
Charlottesville Monument Lesson- A Troubled Past
lesson
64 Downloads
Write a review

Charlottesville Monument Lesson- A Troubled Past

Share

Share On Facebook
Share On Twitter
Share On Pinterest
Share On LinkedIn
Email
Grade Level Grades 9-12
Standards Alignment
Common Core State Standards
License

About This Lesson

The lesson includes 5 steps that students go through to reflect on what they have seen in the news since August 12th and how the debate around public history has suddenly become very relevant.  Students should be asked to think and reflect individually before joining in small groups to take on the role of deciding what historical figures are deserving of recognition and what kind of commemoration is appropriate.  The goal of creating criteria for evaluation is to have students recognize that there are ways to guard against the "slippery slope" argument that "if we remove one slave-holder we have to remove them all."

Examples provided are intended to build on previous US history knowledge with some obvious choices left out (Native American Battlefields, the Enola Gay, etc.) because they appear elsewhere in the upcoming curriculum.  Anne Frank and the Holocaust should lead to an interesting discussion about why non-US events and people might also be commemorated in the US.  

Links to some possible articles are also included for use on with common core standards and as additional information for teachers and students.

Standards

Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience’s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, including the validity of the reasoning as well as the relevance and sufficiency of the evidence.
Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
Delineate and evaluate the argument and specific claims in a text, assessing whether the reasoning is valid and the evidence is relevant and sufficient; identify false statements and fallacious reasoning.

Reviews

Write A Review

Be the first to submit a review!

Advertisement