Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Reshapes Presidential Power
Ask students: Why should the president be presumed to be immune to prosecution for "official acts," according to the Supreme Court?
Share
July 3, 2024
Ask students: Why should the president be presumed to be immune to prosecution for "official acts," according to the Supreme Court?
Share
In one of the most anticipated rulings of the year, the Supreme Court declared that former President Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for any so-called “official act” taken as president, but not “unofficial ones'' taken as a candidate. Amna Nawaz discussed how the ruling reshapes presidential power with News Hour Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle and William Brangham.
View the transcript of the story.
What do you think are some of the benefits and risks of presidents having legal protection for acts taken while president? What do you think will be the consequences of this decision on the ways presidents govern?
Media literacy: Why do you think the producers chose the two guests that appear in this segment? Who else might be able to help viewers understand the decision?
As a class, read the following article explaining what the ruling means for cases against former president Trump. Then discuss how this ruling might affect the relationship between the three branches of government in the future.
Share My Lesson has free, tailored preK-12 resources to ensure your students leave your classroom equipped with a deeper knowledge of civics and government to think critically about today's toughest issues.
Republished with permission from PBS NewsHour Classroom.