Supreme Court Immunity Ruling Reshapes Presidential Power
Ask students: Why should the president be presumed to be immune to prosecution for "official acts," according to the Supreme Court?
Share
July 3, 2024
Ask students: Why should the president be presumed to be immune to prosecution for "official acts," according to the Supreme Court?
Share
In one of the most anticipated rulings of the year, the Supreme Court declared that former President Trump is immune from criminal prosecution for any so-called “official act” taken as president, but not “unofficial ones'' taken as a candidate. Amna Nawaz discussed how the ruling reshapes presidential power with News Hour Supreme Court analyst Marcia Coyle and William Brangham.
View the transcript of the story.
What do you think are some of the benefits and risks of presidents having legal protection for acts taken while president? What do you think will be the consequences of this decision on the ways presidents govern?
Media literacy: Why do you think the producers chose the two guests that appear in this segment? Who else might be able to help viewers understand the decision?
As a class, read the following article explaining what the ruling means for cases against former president Trump. Then discuss how this ruling might affect the relationship between the three branches of government in the future.
Explore free, classroom-ready lessons on the Supreme Court, the Constitution, and the balance of power among the three branches. From landmark cases to today's biggest civic debates, Share My Lesson helps students build the background knowledge and critical-thinking skills to understand how government really works.
Republished with permission from PBS NewsHour Classroom.